Cogito ergo spring

Matt F

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by Matt F » Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:06 am

I've been giving this supension qustion a lot of thought.  Well, perhaps not a lot of thought, but it comes to mind at odd and idle times.  So what I've come up with may or may not be helpful.

My first thought is that the "if you stand on the car, do the damper bodies move?" test might not be quite right.

If you could fix the frame solidly, and then stand on the front wheel, or seriously lift the same wheel, it would droop or bounce.  This would pull or push the steering linkage, which would work the rack, and then the pinion, and then move the steering wheel.

So the movement in the front wheel caused the steering wheel to move; but we wouldn't say that the steering wheel is unsprung mass.

I think that a better definition of unsprung mass might involve the bits and pieces that change in geometry as the wheels go up and down.  That's pretty simply, but I think it's pretty accurate.

Of course, it's better to have less weight in any of the suspension components.  But if the shock and dampener work in a strictly linear fashion, as actuated by rocker arms, I'm not sure that the weight of the components is very important.  As long as the springs do their job, and the dampers do theirs, and both are mated correctly, and they are also help within the body of the car, I'm not sure that inverting them would do much for either ride or steering sensitivity.

But, as I said, those are my random thought, and I encourage others.

--Matt

Matt F

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by Matt F » Sat Oct 29, 2005 12:46 am

Cogito ergo nihil, if that's the right declination.  ;)

User avatar
Bruce Fielding
Posts: 16320
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by Bruce Fielding » Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:42 am

[quote="Matt F"]
Cogito ergo nihil, if that's the right declination.  ;)
[/quote]

I think, therefore I am nothing?
Ariel Atom Owners Club founder, based in Central London

ka mano

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by ka mano » Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:31 am

Aurigo ergo sum.
Last edited by ka mano on Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Matt F

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by Matt F » Sat Oct 29, 2005 12:08 pm

That isn't right at all.

I need to start over.  All I really remember is "agricola, agricolae... um... agricolarum... um..." 

Oh, never mind.

User avatar
Bruce Fielding
Posts: 16320
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by Bruce Fielding » Sat Oct 29, 2005 12:17 pm

Bellum Bellum Belli Bella Bello Bello
Bella Bella Bella Bellorum Belllis Bellis

'There having been wars'

Used to be able to do that in Greek, too - once upon a time when I was clever and did Latin and Greek at 'O' level...

Oh, and as for Agricola:

agricola agricola agricolae agricolae agricolam agricola
agricolae agricolae agricolarum agricolis agricolas agricolis

How many other car forums teach you ancient and dead langauges?
Last edited by Bruce Fielding on Sat Oct 29, 2005 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ariel Atom Owners Club founder, based in Central London

Matt F

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by Matt F » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:35 am

Well, my Latin is obviously lacking.

Are my thoughts on suspension any better?  Or is it time to let this thread quietly fade away?

jaimin

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by jaimin » Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:18 am

Want a hand? "Racecar Vehicle Dynamics" by William and Doug Millikien avalible off the www.SAE.org website. The proper term isn't rocker arms, its bellcranks and push rods. since unsprung mass refers to anything not supported by the shocks and dampners, uprights, rims, brake discs and calipers, etc. shocks do apply. orientation COULD produce different effects, but more would be gained by weighing corners. on the subject of weighing, for you US guys, try Longacre scales, they are worth every dime.

Matt F

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by Matt F » Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:46 am

[quote="Bruce Fielding"]
[quote="Matt F"]
Cogito ergo nihil, if that's the right declination.   ;)
[/quote]

I think, therefore I am nothing?
[/quote]

Wait a minute...  That's not the right translation either.

Wouldn't it be "I think therefore nothingness?"

And I need some help to translate ka mano's Latin...

(Thank you to Jaimin for a real response.)

ka mano

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by ka mano » Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:39 am

hint: think 'chariot'

Matt F

Re: Cogito ergo spring

Post by Matt F » Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:58 pm

I got it now.  Thank you!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest