Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

All things Atomic
User avatar
woodsypedia
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:37 pm
Location: Oxfordshire
Contact:

Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by woodsypedia » Mon Feb 20, 2023 3:12 pm

Hey Folks

I watched the Harry Metcalf video about his advanced geo setup on his Project 8 Jag. There are a few companies that offer an advanced alignment and some tweaks to make cars incredible on track.

Question: Has anyone done anything similar to their Atom? I've not touched anything geo or suspension wise on the car other than adjusting the firmness on track days. I push my card quite hard on track and I think I'm starting to get to the limits so wondering what else I can do to get a few extra percentage points from it.

Cheers

Chris.

User avatar
Curves Junkie
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:37 pm
Location: Germany, Baden-Wuerttemberg
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by Curves Junkie » Tue Feb 21, 2023 9:42 am

woodsypedia wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 3:12 pm I watched the Harry Metcalf video about his advanced geo setup on his Project 8 Jag
Link to the video please
Ariel Atom 3 [2010] Honda 2.0 K20Z4 with JacksonRacing SC only 370PS :H: - never, ever for sale
Abarth 595 Competizione [2016] - now my daughters car
Porsche 718 Spyder [11/2019] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHb3-aNuZzQ

GraemeW
Posts: 1311
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 8:46 am
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by GraemeW » Tue Feb 21, 2023 9:52 am

I’ve been thinking the same after changing the geo on my Alpine A110. The settings of which were designed by David Pook, also in that video.

I was surprised how much better the car was than the already good original settings. David an ex Jaguar chassis engineer now specialises in Alpine settings and aftermarket. Reading about his work, I didn’t realise how much of a difference minor tweaking of the geo makes for different driving styles. Got me thinking about the atom. Ariel will understand all this suff as well, and could perhaps advise on bespoke geo?

GraemeW
Posts: 1311
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 8:46 am
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by GraemeW » Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:02 am


User avatar
Curves Junkie
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:37 pm
Location: Germany, Baden-Wuerttemberg
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by Curves Junkie » Tue Feb 21, 2023 7:50 pm

woodsypedia wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 3:12 pm Question: Has anyone done anything similar to their Atom?
Yes.
A good idea will be only one parameter change it until it fits, then change the next one.

And don't forget the Corner weight.
GraemeW wrote: Tue Feb 21, 2023 9:52 am I was surprised how much better the car was than the already good original settings.
...
Ariel will understand all this suff as well, and could perhaps advise on bespoke geo?
Perfect video, super explained.
The statement about the ride height is true - but only to a limited extent with the Ariel.
If you adjust the ride height with the spring screw, the explanation is correct.
But if you turn the pushrod, the full capability of the suspension is maintained.

I played around with the setting countless times until I found the right settings for me and thus gained confidence in the car.
And Graeme, you saw in the Alps on our tours together, how much faster I could go in the corners.

The factory can only do a basic set-up. Every rider has to set up the Ariel for his own needs.
For example, some love toe-out, others prefer toe-in. Some prefer understeer, others oversteer, or neither.
Ariel Atom 3 [2010] Honda 2.0 K20Z4 with JacksonRacing SC only 370PS :H: - never, ever for sale
Abarth 595 Competizione [2016] - now my daughters car
Porsche 718 Spyder [11/2019] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHb3-aNuZzQ

plip1953
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 10, 2022 7:40 am
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by plip1953 » Wed Feb 22, 2023 10:05 am

What are the factory recommended settings on the 3.5? What's recommended on the 4 is actually pretty much spot on. But don't just assume that what's on your car right now will be as per factory specs. On some cars the alignment will go out of spec even after one track day. We have ours checked, and adjusted if necessary, before every outing.

User avatar
Curves Junkie
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:37 pm
Location: Germany, Baden-Wuerttemberg
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by Curves Junkie » Wed Feb 22, 2023 10:13 am

plip1953 wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 10:05 am What are the factory recommended settings on the 3.5?
I don't know. Please give Steve from the factory a call.
plip1953 wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 10:05 am On some cars the alignment will go out of spec even after one track day. We have ours checked, and adjusted if necessary, before every outing.
Correct. I check my settings myself several times during the season. A three quarter hour job.
Ariel Atom 3 [2010] Honda 2.0 K20Z4 with JacksonRacing SC only 370PS :H: - never, ever for sale
Abarth 595 Competizione [2016] - now my daughters car
Porsche 718 Spyder [11/2019] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHb3-aNuZzQ

plip1953
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 10, 2022 7:40 am
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by plip1953 » Wed Feb 22, 2023 8:52 pm

I only work with 4s, but was quite interested to know if there's much if any difference in the factory recommended settings for 3.5 and 4.

On the 4 we've not settled on -1mm total toe out on the front, +4mm total toe in on the rear, -2deg front camber and -2.5deg rear camber.

Would anyone else care to share what they've found works well? Previous experience suggests that few will openly share and most don't have a clue anyway!

User avatar
Curves Junkie
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:37 pm
Location: Germany, Baden-Wuerttemberg
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by Curves Junkie » Thu Feb 23, 2023 11:25 am

plip1953 wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 8:52 pm Would anyone else care to share what they've found works well? Previous experience suggests that few will openly share
Yes, unfortunately I have to agree with you there.
I also think it's a pity that, especially in such a small fan community, experiences are not shared. This would certainly help to prevent a lot of accidents.
I have no problem passing on my expertise.


4s?? Is this the American model of the Ariel Atom 4?

Unfortunately I can't tell you much about the AA4, as I drive an AA3.
The chassis values could be similar, but you have to consider that the AA4 is heavier and therefore has more grip on the front axle.

Ride height:
Here viewtopic.php?f=47&t=17315 Henry wrote something about the ride height of the AA3.x.
In my opinion, it is important that the nuts on the coil springs are both set the same - i.e. on each axle. It should also be noted that the more the suspension spring is screwed in, the less the suspension can work. So it is better to set the correct ride height on the pushrod.

Camber and toe:
I drive my AA3 on the mountain passes and track.
Therefore I have set -1.5 to -2.0° camber at the front and -2.0 to -3.25° camber at the rear.
With toe-out, I personally find the vehicle too unsteady on country roads, so I drive 0 to 0.5mm toe-in each side at the front. In the rear I also use 4mm toe-in each side.

Please do not forget: corner weight the car.
Ariel Atom 3 [2010] Honda 2.0 K20Z4 with JacksonRacing SC only 370PS :H: - never, ever for sale
Abarth 595 Competizione [2016] - now my daughters car
Porsche 718 Spyder [11/2019] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHb3-aNuZzQ

plip1953
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 10, 2022 7:40 am
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by plip1953 » Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:53 pm

Curves Junkie wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 11:25 am
plip1953 wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 8:52 pm Would anyone else care to share what they've found works well? Previous experience suggests that few will openly share
Yes, unfortunately I have to agree with you there.
I also think it's a pity that, especially in such a small fan community, experiences are not shared. This would certainly help to prevent a lot of accidents.
I have no problem passing on my expertise.


4s?? Is this the American model of the Ariel Atom 4?

Unfortunately I can't tell you much about the AA4, as I drive an AA3.
The chassis values could be similar, but you have to consider that the AA4 is heavier and therefore has more grip on the front axle.

Ride height:
Here viewtopic.php?f=47&t=17315 Henry wrote something about the ride height of the AA3.x.
In my opinion, it is important that the nuts on the coil springs are both set the same - i.e. on each axle. It should also be noted that the more the suspension spring is screwed in, the less the suspension can work. So it is better to set the correct ride height on the pushrod.

Camber and toe:
I drive my AA3 on the mountain passes and track.
Therefore I have set -1.5 to -2.0° camber at the front and -2.0 to -3.25° camber at the rear.
With toe-out, I personally find the vehicle too unsteady on country roads, so I drive 0 to 0.5mm toe-in each side at the front. In the rear I also use 4mm toe-in each side.

Please do not forget: corner weight the car.
4s as in more than one AA4 lol

Your range of camber settings are pretty wide. Have you not found a sweet spot?

Front toe-out isn't everyone's cup of tea, but does tend to make the turn in sharper. 4mm toe in each side on the rear is quite a lot, but if that's what needed to tame the rear end then so be it.

User avatar
Curves Junkie
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:37 pm
Location: Germany, Baden-Wuerttemberg
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by Curves Junkie » Thu Feb 23, 2023 3:10 pm

plip1953 wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:53 pm 4s as in more than one AA4
Don't understand this joke.
plip1953 wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:53 pm Your range of camber settings are pretty wide.
No, isn't it.
-1.5° front and range -2.0 to 2.5° rear is perfect for me at the alps.
More is for track.
No - 4mm toe-in each is not too much.
Ariel Atom 3 [2010] Honda 2.0 K20Z4 with JacksonRacing SC only 370PS :H: - never, ever for sale
Abarth 595 Competizione [2016] - now my daughters car
Porsche 718 Spyder [11/2019] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHb3-aNuZzQ

K20A2
Posts: 270
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: NRW - Germany
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by K20A2 » Thu Feb 23, 2023 4:43 pm

Curves Junkie wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 3:10 pm
plip1953 wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:53 pm 4s as in more than one AA4
Don't understand this joke.
"I only work with 4s"

"4s" ist hier der Plural von (Atom) 4, also mehrere Atom 4.

User avatar
Curves Junkie
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:37 pm
Location: Germany, Baden-Wuerttemberg
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by Curves Junkie » Thu Feb 23, 2023 7:06 pm

@K20A2

Thx for your support / und die Erklärung in deutsch.
Ariel Atom 3 [2010] Honda 2.0 K20Z4 with JacksonRacing SC only 370PS :H: - never, ever for sale
Abarth 595 Competizione [2016] - now my daughters car
Porsche 718 Spyder [11/2019] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHb3-aNuZzQ

YannickFr
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by YannickFr » Wed Apr 03, 2024 2:24 pm

Hi!
I tried a lot of setup on mine.
Only track use.
I have ariel’s geo but with more camber.
Front: 0.18° toe out , 2,5° camber (max with the same value R/L)
Rear: 0.25° toe in, 2.8° camber (max with the same value R/L).
You can choose more toe in for the rear, to avoid to much oversteer. But oversteer is why atom is so fun for me.
Depend of your shocks too. I now have ohlins and it sonwell balance!

Jallan
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 7:23 am
Contact:

Re: Atom 3.5r Geometry and Alignment Setups

Post by Jallan » Sat Apr 06, 2024 6:24 am

Hi,

I had my Atom 3 geo setup and corner weighted by String Theory Garage in Stratford upon Avon. Ben (the owner) is a genius and transformed the way my atom handled. I was having issues with mine following the road camber too much, being difficult to correct when cornering and overall felt unstable.

As I had only had the atom for 6 months or so, I asked him to make it a 'beginner to intermediate friendly' setup, so it will be a lot less likely to snap oversteer and be a bit more forgiving when things go wrong, but you could ask for a more race bias setup if you wanted.

I think it cost about £510 a year ago, it I would say it was worth every penny.

Let me know if you want more info as I'm sure I could dig out the geo settings.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest