Page 2 of 3

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:42 pm
by bolus
[quote="RichardR"]



[img width=758 height=600]http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/5307/mg2529.jpg[/img]
[/quote]

Cool shot.  How did you compose this?

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:01 pm
by Alec
[quote="Ged"]
[quote="Alec"]
[quote="wisp"]
..all done with mirrors.
[/quote]

What's the graphics on the panels?
[/quote]

Hehe Alec I think it's a girl!
[/quote]

No, the girl's sitting on the chassis and, as Wisp said, it's the Mobi phone logo that's on the panels.

Image

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 4:55 pm
by 1965Cobra427
Name your weapon! .... Atoms at dawn!
[img width=800 height=533]http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h269/ ... C_0091.jpg[/img]

[img width=800 height=533]http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h269/ ... _00911.jpg[/img]

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:52 pm
by Billy Og
"Passing about" in Switzerland.  This was taken just after Julier pass.

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:36 pm
by Gage
[quote="Paul"]
"Passing about" in Switzerland.  This was taken just after Julier pass.
[/quote]

That shot is fantastic.  Thanks for sharing.

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:42 pm
by mobilerobbie
is this Arty or what?

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:57 pm
by Billy Og
Another couple from the Swiss Alps - a fantastic day

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:06 pm
by tarsman013
[quote="mobilerobbie"]
is this Arty or what?
[/quote]

is that what i think it is???

(atom500)

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:10 pm
by bolus
[quote="tarsman013"]
[quote="mobilerobbie"]
is this Arty or what?
[/quote]

is that what i think it is???

(atom500)

[/quote]

Nope, the German dealer adds the side scoops (with nothing in them :) )

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:21 pm
by mobilerobbie
but in this one there is a chargecooler in the sidepods!

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:23 pm
by bolus
cool!  any other modifications to the engine?  you running more HP then?

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:24 pm
by mobilerobbie
2 settings, 340 BHP or 400 BHP.... :D

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:43 am
by Lane
These photos were taken in a very remote location near where I grew up in Wisconsin.  No matter how far I've traveled, I don't think I've ever come across a view this beautiful.  Only recently did I remember this spot from when I was a child and I'm glad I finally got around to taking pics of the Atom there.

Image
Image

These 800x600 resizes don't do the photos justice.  View these and ten others from this location in my website album here in MUCH higher resolution and quality.

I stuck two other shots in the Non-Track photo competition section as well.

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:32 am
by Driver
Looks like a great location. I have a similar memory/setting from riding enduros in Sam Houston National Forest. Those are Terrific shots. The last one has a real ethereal quality.  :tu: :tu:  Is that all natural lighting or a little tweeking in photoshop? Wait.... just went to the site... Single or multi frame HDR?  Also Tripod or handheld? First time I tried it was with Peters car last year and a remote release on a tripod REALLY helps keep the edges. I'm still playing with HDR, for most people online in those topics it's a love it or hate process. Going to try a few more attempts at AtomFest II if possible. Great shots, I'll have to snag a couple for my HDTV's screen saver/slide show when it's on the computer input..

Re: 2009 - Arty category.

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:46 pm
by Lane
[quote="Driver"]
Is that all natural lighting or a little tweeking in photoshop? Wait.... just went to the site... Single or multi frame HDR?  Also Tripod or handheld?
[/quote]

Lighting is all natural and I didn't do any image manipulation other than what the HDR software does on one of its more mild effect settings.  In retrospect, I probably should have used the camera's manual white balance setting (with a white card or something) as all the green surroundings did appear to skew the overall tone a bit.  I used auto-exposure bracketing of 2/3 stop if I remember correctly, with 3 frames for each shot.  Cam was on a tripod at its lowest ISO and using the smallest aperatures that I could for decent depth-of-field.  Nothing too special for the camera either - it's amazing what a middle-of-the-line digital cam can spit out these days if you read the manual and know how to use it.  ;D